XML settings part 2
No doubt someone will counter with the fact that thousands of people use Spring and all is well. Yes, thousands of people also used EJB2, oddly enough the very same places that switched to Spring. What are the chances of all these venues suddenly becoming full of wise intelligent developers who from now on will only make sensible sane well considered decisions?
That problem makes it somewhat understandable that the Spring guys, in order to defend their fucked up theassness, deride annotations and proclaim that declarative xml goop is Rod’s Holy Word. Go forth and write xml, Rod proclaims, and the unwashed masses go forth and positively ooze angular brackets. Stupid fucks. Still, all is not lost, in cases where it’s possible to shoehorn annotations into Spring’s archaic innards, they’ll enthusiastically proclaim it Useful and Recommended, such as the @Transactional annotation.
The other common argument is ‘you don’t spend too much time in Spring’s xml compared to time spent in your code’. Sure, I also didn’t spend much time writing ejb2 descriptors either (xdoclet did it), yet everyone bitches about those. Why can’t we apply the same standards to Spring?
Fundamentally, Spring has a tough time accepting that the world has moved on, and that its approaches are starting to look a wee bit outdated. Even EE 5 in many cases looks more modern and usable than some of its approaches. Thanks to its widespread use, they can, much like the JBoss people, maintain an insular world view where they’re surrounded by sycophants who do nothing but bend over with a shiteating grin plastered over their sallow filthy faces.
Your configuration bean bullshit still doesn’t cut it, dependencies are best expressed where they belong, in the damn source code itself.
