About Junit
What is surprising about Junit is the religious aspect of it. For example, some comment on a blog a few weeks back had someone spouting shite like ‘well I’m not a zealot or anything, but I would never use code with no unit tests, it works by accident not design’. What’s particularly sickening about this is the fuckfaced disclaimer up front. It puts the whole thing right up there with such gems as ‘Well I’m no racist but those niggers…’ and ‘I’m no bible thumper but YOUR ALL BURNING IN HELL YOU GODDAM ABORTION LOVING BABYKILLERS’ (Note: The typo is deliberate).
Surprisingly, the developer world hobbled along quite successfully before junit. Huge portions of it keep on hobbling that way with astounding success. See, what people seem to have forgotten is that a unit test does not mandate junit. It’s the approach that matters. Coverage reports are there to make things more sexually stimulating, they’re NOT a fundamental part of the approach. You could have plenty of unit tests that are nothing more that main methods in your various implementation classes. That still has its value, and certainly is more useful than no tests at all.
The JUnit fetishists are the freakiest of them all. What’s impressive is that they’ve invented this whole new universe just to justify what a horrifically broken tool they’ve staked their careers on (yes thoughtworks fuckstains, I’m pointing and laughing at you, you dirty chozgobbling rumprangers). Need static initialisation for shared or expensive resources? Not possible in Junit! Therefore, it’s evil! if you need to do it you’re broken!
The same goes for anyone who ever expresses any need for something beyond one method one test. Why the religious zealotry here? We all write code every day that requires more than one method, so why can’t our tests function similarly? Why is it so unthinkable that there might be some element of good unit testing that are not fully captured by JUnit?
The sickest joke in all this is how badly JUnit itself is written. Just read some of the javadocs and inline comments, they make it fairly clear that a fairly liberal amount of drugs had been imbibed in the course of writing it all.
So I ask you, all of you who want nothing more in life than to bend over and have JUnit plug all your orifices, why? What do you get out of it? Why this sickening allegiance to a flawed, old, unmaintained, and dysfunctional tool?
